The ElectroHemp Table 1 below demonstrates how ElectroHemp BioRad 5 Stage Treatment Train works as a system and process while addressing the safety and concerns.
|
Organic Remediation and Toxic Cleanup Its Not Rocket Science - Its Phyto Science. The magic happens in the roots of the plants Naturally with Phytoremediation
Friday, June 24, 2016
Contain and Control BioRad 5 Stage Treatment Train
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
5 Blog Articles Plants as Water Protectors Series
ElectroHemp Natural and Organic BioRad 5 Stage Treatment Train speeds up the Toxic Removal Process |
The ElectroHemp BioRad Remediation System and Process works faster than Phytoremediation alone by incorporating Electrokinetics into the system.
Electrokinetics directs the heavy metal toxins to a central point where plants phytoextract the toxins. |
Article 4- Plants as Water Protectors
Article 3- Citizen Science Phytoremediation Research StLouis
Article 2- St Louis IKEA Phyto Buffer Zone pt2
Article 1- IKEAs lesser known environmental project
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
ElectroHemp BioRad Remediation Pilot Study Discussion
-------
Discussions have begun about a Pilot Study Location for the ElectroHemp BioRad hazardous waste removal system. Stay Tuned for more details and see the announcement at the Hemp Environmental Forums Facebook page
#phytoremediation with #electrokinetics speeds up the toxic removal process. < this is nothing new. > But what is new is the organic disposal system for the toxic plants that eliminate Long Term Nuclear Waste Storage! Rememeber its our Tax Dollars that pay for this. Eliminating this part of the nuclear waste storage will save the USA Taxpayers multi-million dollars. |
ElectroHemp BioRad Remediation Pilot Study Location Discussion https://t.co/mAySxxTJtW #WestlakeLandfill #NuclearWaste #Remediation— Scotty (@StLHandyMan) September 19, 2017
Also shared to LinkedIn
ElectroHemp BioRad LinkedIn Post Notice |
Monday, December 31, 2018
2018 ElectroHemp Most Read Blog Post
10 most read ElectroHemp Blogger stats analytics report Dec 2017 to Dec 2018
Post - Post Date - Pageviews
- Using Trees to Clean Up Pollution Cristina Negriu - Jul, 2016 - 637
- Citizen Science Phytoremediation Research StLouis Jul 20, 2017 -603
- Phytoremediation Rafts with Electrokinetics - Aug 6, 2017 -527
- Yes its faster and better than phytoremediation alone -Mar 27, 2016 - 476
- ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Greenhouse Discussion - Mar 22, 2016 -409
- Healthy Environments Require Citizen Scientists - Aug 19, 2016 - 370
- IKEAs lesser known environmental project -Aug 31, 2016 -342
- St Louis IKEA Phyto Buffer Zone pt2 - Sep 1, 2016 - 304
- MOhempEnergy: Phytoremediation Research Articles - May 31, 2016 -298
- 79 Research Articles on Phytoremediation for Bioenergy Jun 26, 2018, 270
10 most read ElectroHemp Blogger stats analytics report Dec 2017 to Dec 2018 |
Sunday, December 30, 2018
Uranium Water Biofilter Remediation
ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Raft designs can be designed to remove any number or combination of toxic pollutants found in water sources |
Previously ElectroHemp highlighted how Natural biofilters for toxic metals can be used for Pb (Lead) Removal. This same technique can be used for Uranium (U) removal.
All that needs to be done is substitute the Raft and Plants that will extract Uranium and it's by products.
Example: A phytoremediation raft can be constructed with these biosorbing products: Tree Bark (Pinus, Acacia), Agro Wastes (Tea Leaves, Rice Hulls) Apple Wastes . With these type of hyperaccumulating plant species: Hemp, Kenaf, Sun Flowers, Mustard Grass, Rape, even some Grasses
To ensure all the Toxic Contamination comes in contact with the Raft and Plant Roots growing on the Phytoremediation Rafts that phytoextract the toxins. ElectroHemps uses Electrokinetics into the Remediation removal process. Electrokinetics draws toxins where directed.
ElectroHemps combines Electrokinetics, Phytoremediation, and Biofilters into the Remediation removal process. Key point: Electrokinetics draws toxins where directed. |
Phytoremediation Raft Remove Toxic Pollutants Water
The following photos are examples of where ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Raft designs can be designed to remove any number or combination of toxic pollutants found in water sources from Bridgetown and Westlake Landfill this would stop the pollution from entering the Public Water Supply, as pointed out by Alex Cohen.
|
The above 3 photos courtesy Environmental Activist and Humanitarian Alex Cohen- https://m.faceboAlex Cohen.
ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Rafts Remediation Example for decontamination of water.
ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Rafts |
Saturday, January 12, 2019
ElectroHemp Remediation Cost Comparison
Reference: Findings and Recommendations for the Remediation...
The costs of remediating a site will vary depending on the concentration and distribution of the contamination, the size and layout of the site, and the remedial actions implemented. Table 6 presents cost estimates associated with each remedial option presented above for 1 acre of contamination that is assumed to be 1 foot deep (1 acre foot). These costs are based on the remediation of undeveloped farmland.
Remediation costs could rise dramatically for existing development due to difficulties associated with the movement of soil around existing structures, trees, pools and decks. In addition, the remediation of properties with existing development would not have the benefits of economy of scale associated with undeveloped land. |
https://www.nj.gov/dep/special/hpctf/final/costs.html
|
$50,000- $100,000 Remedial Option Cost per acre-foot
- Low: $50,000 ÷ 43,560 = $1.15 /cuyd
- High: $100,000 ÷ 43,560 = $2.30 /cuyd
Wednesday, January 2, 2019
2019 R&D ElectroHemp
ElectroHemp is preparing for R&D Projects that will highlight how their system speeds up contamination removal and organically disposes hazardous waste.
- Phytoremediation Assisted Contamination Cleanup
- Organic Hazardous Waste Disposal
- Turning Hazardous Waste into income
- Soil and Water Buffer Zones
- Phytoremediation Rafts for water cleanup and remediation
If you or your organization would like to join in, partner, sponsor, advertise, or just learn more about the R&D projects use the contact form, subscribe to the blog feed or stay tuned by monitoring the blog.
Wednesday, July 6, 2016
Using Trees to Clean Up Pollution Cristina Negri
Eye Opening Discussion on Phytoremediation- the stuff that was most appealing to me started at 31:00 and talks about phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Nuclides: like the ones that are causing the cancer, respiratory issues, extra rare forms of cancer, lymphoma, etc for the Residents of St Louis Region.
- Presenter Instructs for Safety Keep It Out of the Food Chain [which is exactly the opposite that was done when Republic Services grew Soybeans on the landfill a few years ago and then took the soybeans to the local grain elevator]
- At 31:00 part of discussion about Phytoremediation and Radionuclides.
- 31:10 Radionuclides Stay where they are at, they don't degrade, you have to move them from one place to another.
- 31:30 yes it will get into the food chain, uses Chernobyl for an example.
- [talking about phytotechnologies and cleanup] She says: can’t get enough of it in one area to justify the expense. Bioaccumulation. Granted this is an older video from 2012 and many cleanup scenarios hopefully have changed and have acknowledged a few ways that Scientist have discovered to get the toxic radiation to bioaccumulate such as #Electrokinetics as used in the ElectroHemp BioRad Hazardous Waste Disposal Environmental Startup
- She talks about Grass will phytoremediate the radionuclides because it was in the Milk from the grass the cows ate [Chernobyl] [Many plant species have the ability to phytoremediate the heavy metals and toxins- Industrial Hemp is a favorite and mentioned frequently at the Hemp Environmental Forum as well as the Kyoto Hemp Forum].
- 36:36 Q: What was working at Chernobyl? Listen to what she says about the people and the desperation “ No hope- because they were not in control of their lives” “Unsettling feeling”.
- 38:33 Q: Future of phytoremediation.
- 39:00 "Invest money" "Keep Working" "No Recovery Is Made Without Funding"
- 39:36 Ground Source Pollution removal works for plants
- 39:54 Q: is it too much for large scale Fukushima radiation poisoning?
- 40:12 A: All Depends...may well be the only choice for certain areas- phytoremediation once again solution for widespread cleanup...work with the [eco] system, you can't be digging everything up...
- 40:54 Audience Questions start
- 41:36 Wolves, Birds supposedly healthy? 1, 2, 3: I have read counter to that. The healthy animals that are seen in the Inclusion Zone are new animals that migrated in. Existing Animals have genetic defects per videos I've seen that didn't come from government sources, like the one with the Moose's neck growing out sideways of its body as well as the mutilated birds. [Radiation causes mutations and alters genes in plants and animals]
- 42:39 Q: what to do with trees once they are cut down after phytoremediation? "Hyperaccumulation of toxins in the plants varies by the growing season. They don't expect the radiation to be in the tree and will mulch it onsite. With Heavy Metals contamination has to be measured before figuring out what to do with it. KEY: when utilizing plants there is less volume at the end. vs scoop, haul, and store. Its preferred that if storage is needed the smaller the mess the better.
- 44:10 Q: Rapid Reuse of Sites with Heavy Metal Contamination- some sites cleaned up by various techniques: water, vapor...get the easy stuff. A: Metals tuff issue they need a solution for metals ...discussion just to leave them alone but need to measure the risk: leave alone or remove...discussion then goes on and states minimization of the toxins (depending on end use of land). With lead keep it away from kids... double stated Heavy Metals are very hard to remove... [ the guy who questioned her said someone then built a children's playground next to the site. Isn't that the airport site in #StLouis... the lady just shrugs? image map]
- 45:59 Presentation Leader adds stuff on the first question: What are end goals in re to Mountain. Q: Primary objective- clean land, Secondary objective- beautification or Reuse. A: Eventual Reuse of land, with main objective to reduce Health Hazard to the people who might be exposed nearby- is the number 1 issue- Mentions: numerous studies to determine what is acceptable dose.
- Phytoremediation for Fracking- been studied and discussed
- Goes on to discuss removing coal ash by phytoremediation, hydrocarbons definately, problem with ash is the ph combinations that might not be compatible with plants.
- In re to chicago river phytoremediation: how to use the specific plants in combination and how to design the system- have to get others involved...Wastewater Treatment uses a natural process using microbes.
- 49:24 Q: Who are the teams/groups of people working on land remediation at Chernobyl. A: She then goes on to mention the needed team members for a multidisciplinary group: Agronomist, Environmentalist, Hydrogeologist- all work together to determine where to plant the trees. Risk Assessment Personal (Safety for personal), Air Modelers to determine what goes into the air and if it is an issue, and Money Managers.
- 52:17 Mentions work done by a Naval person who developed plants that act as a canary in the coal mine. These plants turn white when exposed to nasty compound (type unknown). When planted around a site they would potentially warn everyone that the toxins are present.
- 53:03 Q: where to get educated. Google Phytoremediation and go to EPA "Citizen's Guide to Phytoremediation" EPA is a strong proponent of this technique
- 54:48 Q: Contaminants when translocated into the plant what happens? A: Some gets released, some is broken down in the plant-degraded, some, when transpired, is killed by UV light. Q2: Are some contaminants released into the atmosphere and we do not want that? A: majority of chemicals that make it to the air get broken down by sunlight...when it is exposed to air is very minute concentrations in parts per billion if not parts per trillion range- very very tiny amounts that will get destroyed, they don't accumulate up,
- 56:24 Q1: Of the phytoremediation techniques that work has there be done a survey where it can be used at? A1: look at EPA gis data on brownfields, tools like decision trees will help figure out what is the best remedy for the land, Q2: Roundup because it kills weeds...A2: using roundup for no till farming has drawbacks and advantages
Is this what happened to all the Milk they didn't use at Chernobyl?
Diabetes & African-Americans https://t.co/imx6gVhA6s Update Sep 2, 2017— Scotty (@StLHandyMan) September 3, 2017
Is this what happened to all the Milk they didn't use at Chernobyl?
Search This Blog
ElectroHemp Introduction
ElectroHemp Hazardous Waste Remediation Intro
ElectroHemp BioRad Hazardous Waste Cleanup Introduction ElectroHemp - BioRad CleanUp 5 Stage Phytoremediation Treatment Train - Remove...
-
Too bad the EPA Scientist weren't interested in Solving the Pollution that is contaminating this earth. https://t.co/Kp1JDyrJKq https:/...
-
Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable Technology Cost and Performance Reports Glass Furnace Technology (GFT) Demonstration at the Hazen ...
-
EPA Takes Important Step to Advance PFAS Strategic Roadmap, Requests Public Input and Data to Inform Potential Future Regulations under CE...