A Natural Solution to the Pollution in the World

 I encourage everyone: if you don't think the creator has provided solutions to our problems, you might try getting out of the box and explore other avenues and thought patterns.

i can't stop them from spraying us with their chem trail geoengineering systems, but I can clean it out of the soil and water, in addition to other forms of pollution and toxins.  its pretty remarkable that the smallest organisms on the planet will take down the baddest and most harmful substances.  its not a coincidence that so many microbiologist have wound up dead in the prior 10 years.   i'm just a carpenter from missouri who asked God to lead me to a way to help my neighbors who have been exposed to the leftover nuclear contamination from the Atom Bomb creation. And thats how i figured out https://www.thepollutionsolution.org/  by reading hundreds of actual science papers where i figured out how to clean up pollution with what mother nature has provided. 

The Pollution Solution : Electricity Production by Geobacter sulfurreducen... https://t.co/xzxowpTHFz pic.twitter.com/hMZjsZ3s9X

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 17, 2023

i'm working a few projects, i've been waiting for an opportunity like this. i have been selecting interim crews to help serve as board members on https://t.co/McBKm8PvPy my other stuff is Farming Related and I also have a Kenya Africa project for later on down the road.

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 23, 2023

The Pollution Solution - https://t.co/6SGxnDqnBs

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 2, 2023

The Solution to Pollution https://t.co/IUKsiT2n1f

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 6, 2023

The Pollution Solution : The efficiency of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in remediating sites #phytoremediation https://t.co/ir6zrge7Oy

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 18, 2023

Dirty Water IN Clean Water OUT. its so simple, that the brainiac scientist in charge can't get outa the box. What do environmental scientist do all day, Play Tiddlywinks? Cuz a lowly carpenter from StLouis MO figured out the solution to the worlds pollution. #CanYouHearMeNOW pic.twitter.com/4j2jf6sWDP

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 18, 2023

i wanna clean up the earth. > WE ARE THE POLLUTION SOLUTION
THE POLLUTION SOLUTION SPECIALIZES IN TECHNIQUES AND SERVICES FOR NATURALLY INSPIRED AND COST EFFECTIVE REMOVAL AND REMEDIATION OF TOXINS AND CONTAMINANTS FROM AIR, SOIL, AND WATER. https://t.co/McBKm8PvPy

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 24, 2023

.@UnitedNewsChan1
back to #ThePollutionSolution here is a slide show about how and why this natural solution can clean up any toxin or pollution. https://t.co/1Q2CGGaQh5

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 2, 2023

Electrohemp was renamed to #PollutionSolution hemp has limits this doesn't. https://t.co/McBKm8PvPy

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) January 25, 2023

Electricity Production by Geobacter sulfurreducens Attachedto Electrodes

ElectroHemp Pollution Disposal Energy Fuel Cell

here is the science behind the Electrohemp Pollution Disposal Energy Fuel Cell:

Electricity Production by

 Geobacter sulfurreducens

 Attachedto Electrodes

Daniel R. Bond and Derek R. Lovley*

 Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003

Received 29 August 2002/Accepted 10 December 2002 my link

Hemp cleans PFAS in water and soil

Does the EPA and American Scientist think they are the only ones who can perform science experiments or develope scientific discoveries? I see a major disconnect and a possible reason why the pollution from the Major Corporations and Big Business continues to pollute the Earth.

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) October 10, 2022

Too bad the EPA Scientist weren't interested in Solving the Pollution that is contaminating this earth. The Warning: Dont Eat the Fish or Deer in Michigan would not be dangerous to consume. https://t.co/Kp1JDyIMMq pic.twitter.com/xlMtQsddGu

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) October 10, 2022

Too bad the EPA Scientist weren't interested in Solving the Pollution that is contaminating this earth. https://t.co/Kp1JDyrJKq https://t.co/estfCyq4uY

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 14, 2022

Too bad the EPA Scientist weren't interested in Solving the Pollution that is contaminating this earth. The Warning: Don't Eat the Fish or Deer in Michigan would not be dangerous to consume. https://t.co/Kp1JDyIMMq pic.twitter.com/xlMtQsddGu

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) October 10, 2022

When Science isn't Science in the Eyes of the EPA.  

The Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART), is a unique, multi-agency proactive approach for coordinating state resources to address per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination. Agencies responsible for environmental protection, public health, natural resources, agriculture, military installations, commercial airports, and fire departments work together to ensure the most efficient and effective response. 

Too bad the EPA Scientist weren't interested in Solving the Pollution that is contaminating this earth.  The Warning: Don't Eat the Fish or Deer in Michigan would not be dangerous to consume.

Hunters concerned about PFAS in the game they harvest can have meat tested by three labs (known as of 11/14/18): Vista Analytical Laboratory, Battelle and GEL Laboratories.

What I experienced first hand when trying to work with SBIR / EPA was that Scientific Research and Science Studies from outside the USA was frowned upon and not generally accepted.  

Hemp Removes PFAS from Water and Soil. Didn't the @EPA get the memo? https://t.co/Kp1JDyrJKq pic.twitter.com/YPy62jFWZy

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) October 10, 2022

Does the EPA and American Scientist think they are the only ones who can perform science experiments or develope scientific discoveries?  I see a major disconnect and a possible reason why the pollution from the Major Corporations and Big Business continues to pollute the Earth.

Researcher Dr Brett Turner from Newcastle University and his team have developed a natural and effective solution for removing toxic PFAS chemicals from groundwater.

 

If they did realize and possibly consider Scientific Remediation Discoveries Such as what Brent Turner of New Castle University has figured out to remove PFAS from water and soil then just maybe issues such as Don't Eat the Fish or Deer would be solved.  

He also explains how their research is also looking at how hemp plants can be used to remediate PFAS contaminated soil. 

The following link to another blog post shares the discovery that Bret Turner has figured the PFAS from clean water and soil 

ElectroHemp Organic Remediation: Hemp PFAS groundwater remediation: Researcher Dr Brett Turner from Newcastle University and his team have developed a natural and effective solution for removing toxic PFAS From Water.

Does the EPA and American Scientist think they are the only ones who can perform science experiments or develope scientific discoveries? I see a major disconnect and a possible reason why the pollution from the Major Corporations and Big Business continues to pollute the Earth.

— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) October 10, 2022

Adruino Pro Job Opening StLouis

https://stlhandyman.tumblr.com/post/639416268271878145/arduino-pro-job-electrohemp-biorad-organic

ElectroHemp cleanup system fixes this

Daily I read about a situation where the ElectroHemp Remediation and Prevention system would save both Business and Public money whether its EPA fines or by cities large and small that have to clean up the water before it is sold to the public.

This latest Iowa cattle feedlot if it would have incorporated a Buffer Zone and or Electrokinetics System the pollution could have been prevented.  

            Lessoning Agriculture Field Water Runnoff Pollution

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 - 11201 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS 66219 Serving Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Nine Tribal Nations Iowa Cattle Feedlot Penalized for Clean Water Act Violations Contact Information: Ben Washburn, 913-551-7364, washburn.ben@epa.gov Environmental News 

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (Lenexa, Kan., Dec. 9, 2020) - A judge has ruled in favor of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and fined Tony and Joshua Brown of Armstrong, Iowa, a $76,000 penalty for violating the federal Clean Water Act. The brothers, doing business as Riverview Cattle, discharged pollutants from their cattle feedlot on 41 days into the East Fork of the Des Moines River, according to the judge’s ruling. “We are encouraged by Judge Coughlin’s ruling,” said David Cozad, director of EPA Region 7’s Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Division. “Animal feedlot pollution is a serious threat to our nation’s waters and this ruling sends the right message that feedlot owners must comply with the law.” Animal feeding operations that contain over 300 head of cattle and discharge pollutants through man-made conveyances to streams and rivers are required to obtain a Clean Water Act permit and take measures to minimize or eliminate discharges of pollutants in stormwater runoff from their facilities. According to the court ruling, Riverview Cattle repeatedly discharged stormwater containing pollutants through an underground pipe that drained into the river, without having obtained a permit. Despite Riverview’s assertion that pollutants never reached the river, Administrative Judge Christine Donelian Coughlin upheld EPA’s observations, modeling, and other evidence, and found the feedlot liable for Clean Water Act violations. Runoff from animal feeding operations regularly contains bacteria, ammonia, and oxygen-depleting substances that are toxic to aquatic life and potentially harmful to people. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources determined that the East Fork of the Des Moines River is impaired for recreational use due to high levels of bacteria, in part resulting from runoff from feedlots. 

 # # # Learn more about EPA Region 7: www.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-region-7-midwest Connect with EPA Region 7 on Facebook: www.facebook.com/eparegion7 Follow us on Twitter: @EPARegion7

Hemp Protein and PFAS Remediation

https://electrohemp.tumblr.com/post/622716124987031552/pfas-contamination-removal-with-hemp-soil-and

ElectroHemp is on Ideascale looking for Partners

https://mohempenergy.ideascale.com/a/ideas/top/campaigns/16398 __________

Lessoning Agriculture Field Water Runnoff Pollution

 Agriculture contaminants is one of the 3 pollution sources quoted in EWG's Tap Water Database: Pollution Sources and is one reason ElectroHemp has been sharing ways farmers can use buffer zones, filter strips with phytoremediation to lesson field pollution runoff scenarios.

Agriculture

Agricultural activities are one of the main sources of water pollution for U.S. rivers, streams, lakes, wetlands and groundwater. Each year, farm operators apply more than 12 million tons of nitrogen fertilizer and 8 million tons of phosphorous fertilizer to cropland, some of which runs off into water sources.

Manure is another important source of water contamination. It’s estimated that livestock produce up to 1 billion tons of manure each year, and runoff from farms and feedlots can be laden with sediments and disease-causing microorganisms. And many pesticides have no federally mandated limits for drinking water, which means utilities and their customers have no benchmark to know if the amount of a specific pesticide in water is safe.

Many water utilities in farm country are forced to treat water supplies to remove agriculture-related pollutants, often relying on expensive processes such as carbon treatment and ion exchange. Despite utilities' efforts, agricultural contaminants are detected in the drinking water served to millions of Americans each year.


Source: EWG's Tap Water Database: Pollution Sources

Guest Scotty, from St. Louis - Electro-Phytoremediation Process 8-22-2016

Updated information after phone conversation with person planning phytoremediation project to use hemp to phytoextract toxins from soil.

Is this the video you mentioned? https://youtu.be/pVVWcd9bXrA  the video below explains why not everyone should be able to do this UNTIL the system is proven safe.

   I am not afraid of exposing corruption and shortsightedness everywhere I find it.  

I'll be doing another radio interview this coming week sometime about the electrohemp system.

Lonnie Simpson is interviewer. She's anti nuke, understands plight of downwinders being exposed to contamination and all the health issues.

She mentioned the latest stuff I've pieced together that is wanted by Dept of Defense in re to uranium is dangerous for my safety. I'm not worried or scared and I'm going to share this to the world. (In addition to I have found a buyer in the health industry for the decontaminated material)

If you researched EPA suggestions you'd realize they have a goal of turning toxins into cash to offset remediation costs.  My end disposal options do this in 2 or more ways. Instead of the costly glass infusion you mentioned.

https://www.epa.gov/risk/calculating-preliminary-remediation-goals-prgs

Preliminary Remediation Goals for Radionuclides (PRG)

FYI: Paul with Fungi Perfecti informed me: mushrooms will decontaminate nuke rads, but mushrooms still need to be picked up and disposed of [or else the contamination will be reintroduced back into the environment].

Here's the info I shared with the World Wide Hemp group I'm a part of.


 https://facebook.com/HempEnvironmentalForum/?

Lonnie also clued me in on the grant writer who won't consider the organic remediation disposal vs nuke ind suggestions.


It should be pretty interesting interview. She's hip to the nuke ind tactics / shortsighted activist etc.


Fyi: i am not going to mention your name or location but I am going to expose what I feel is shortsighted science because you won't or haven't researched a true solution on this issue.


I'll send more info when we hash out an interview time and where to view it.

Peace,
Scotty

ElectroHemp Remediation Cost Comparison

ElectroHemp cost comparison with traditional remediation technique. 1 city block.

Reference: Findings and Recommendations for the Remediation...

The costs of remediating a site will vary depending on the concentration and distribution of the contamination, the size and layout of the site, and the remedial actions implemented. Table 6 presents cost estimates associated with each remedial option presented above for 1 acre of contamination that is assumed to be 1 foot deep (1 acre foot). These costs are based on the remediation of undeveloped farmland.      Remediation costs could rise dramatically for existing development due to difficulties associated with the movement of soil around existing structures, trees, pools and decks. In addition, the remediation of properties with existing development would not have the benefits of economy of scale associated with undeveloped land.

https://www.nj.gov/dep/special/hpctf/final/costs.html

Proven and innovative soil treatment technologies
$50,000- $100,000 Remedial Option Cost per acre-foot

1 acre=1 acre is approximately 208.71 feet × 208.71 feet (a square) = 1 acre = 43,560 square feet X 1 foot soil = 43,560 cu yds soil

• Low:  $50,000 ÷   43,560 = $1.15 /cuyd
• High: $100,000 ÷ 43,560 = $2.30 /cuyd

_____

1 city block Ave size = typical city block as 100,000 sq.ft. 100,000 X 1 foot deep = 100,000 cu yd soil

_____

Traditional $115,000 To $230,000

ElectroHemp $100,333 $15,000 to $130,000 Cheaper

2019 R&D ElectroHemp

ElectroHemp is preparing for R&D Projects that will highlight how their system speeds up contamination removal and organically disposes hazardous waste.

• Phytoremediation Assisted Contamination Cleanup
• Organic Hazardous Waste Disposal
• Turning Hazardous Waste into income
• Soil and Water Buffer Zones
• Phytoremediation Rafts for water cleanup and remediation 

If you or your organization would like to join in, partner, sponsor, advertise, or just learn more about the R&D projects use the contact form, subscribe to the blog feed or stay tuned by monitoring the blog.

 ElectroHemp Feed

Remediation Terminology Definitions

Frequently used Soil and Water definitions ElectroHemp uses  when sharing the BioRad system and process which organically cleans Water and Soil in the Phyto-Enhanced system.

Phytoremediation is defined by UNEP as the living green plants for in sutu removal, degradtion, and containment in soils, surface waters, and groundwater.

Bioremediation is a process that uses mainly microorganisms, plants, or microbial or plant enzymes to detoxify contaminates in the soil and other environments.

Contamination is defined as any impairment of the quality of the water of the State by sewage or industrial waste to a degree which creates an actual hazard to public health thru poisoning or through the spread of infectious disease.

Heavy Metals are defined as the metals that have an atomic mass greater than 20 and are transition metals, metalloids, actinides, and lanthanides.

Toxicity is the ability of a substance to cause a living organism to undergo adverse effects upon exposure.

ElectroHemp 2019 Plans

2019 is the year ElectroHemp takes Phytoremediation Assisted Science to the Field in Pilot Study activities.
The Future Phytoremediation Assisted Soil and Water Cleanup Pilot Study Activity will include:

1. Business Partnerships
2. Job openings
3. Science and Scientific collaboration

ElectroHemp Green Remediation Intro

ElectroHemp Pilot Study's will be undertaken to perfect and streamline the organic green remediation system and process of the Team has been fine-tuning.
ElectroHemp Job Opportunity Examples: 9 or More job slots with possible Dual and Tri job responsibilities.

• Volunteers
• College Internships
• Hazmat Equipment Operator / Driver
• Greenhouse / Horticulturalists
• Environmental Scientist Laboratory & Testing Technician
• Mechanical + Equipment Mechanic
• Electronics Equipment Installation + maintenance
• Records and Bookkeeper 
• Attorney Environmental + Patents
• Spokesmen - Advertising 
• Marketing - Sales - Contracts

 If you are interested in joining the ElectroHemp team or have a property in the St.Louis Region you need assistance with we are interested in working with you.

ElectroHemp cleans soil and water with a Phytoremediation assisted process that turns pollution into cash.

2018 ElectroHemp Most Read Blog Post

10 most read ElectroHemp Blogger stats analytics report Dec 2017 to Dec 2018

Post - Post Date - Pageviews

1. Using Trees to Clean Up Pollution Cristina Negriu - Jul, 2016 - 637
2. Citizen Science Phytoremediation Research StLouis Jul 20, 2017 -603
3. Phytoremediation Rafts with Electrokinetics - Aug 6, 2017 -527
4. Yes its faster and better than phytoremediation alone -Mar 27, 2016 - 476
5. ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Greenhouse Discussion - Mar 22, 2016 -409
6. Healthy Environments Require Citizen Scientists - Aug 19, 2016 - 370
7. IKEAs lesser known environmental project -Aug 31, 2016 -342
8. St Louis IKEA Phyto Buffer Zone pt2 - Sep 1, 2016 - 304
9. MOhempEnergy: Phytoremediation Research Articles - May 31, 2016 -298
10. 79 Research Articles on Phytoremediation for Bioenergy Jun 26, 2018, 270

10 most read ElectroHemp Blogger stats analytics report Dec 2017 to Dec 2018

Phytoremediation Raft Remove Toxic Pollutants Water

The following photos are examples of where ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Raft designs can be designed to remove any number or combination of toxic pollutants found in water sources from Bridgetown and Westlake Landfill this would stop the pollution from entering the Public Water Supply, as pointed out by Alex Cohen.

The above 3 photos courtesy Environmental Activist and Humanitarian Alex Cohen- https://m.faceboAlex Cohen.
ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Rafts Remediation Example for decontamination of water.

ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Rafts

Uranium Water Biofilter Remediation

ElectroHemp blog post on Uranium Reducing Phytoremediation Raft Design

ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Raft designs can be designed to remove any number or combination of toxic pollutants found in water sources

Previously ElectroHemp highlighted how Natural biofilters for toxic metals can be used for Pb (Lead) Removal. This same technique can be used for Uranium (U) removal. 
All that needs to be done is substitute the Raft and Plants that will extract Uranium and it's by products.
Example: A phytoremediation raft can be constructed with these biosorbing products: Tree Bark (Pinus, Acacia), Agro Wastes (Tea Leaves, Rice Hulls) Apple Wastes . With these type of hyperaccumulating plant species: Hemp, Kenaf, Sun Flowers, Mustard Grass, Rape, even some Grasses 
To ensure all the Toxic Contamination comes in contact with the Raft and Plant Roots growing on the Phytoremediation Rafts that phytoextract the toxins. ElectroHemps uses Electrokinetics into the Remediation removal process. Electrokinetics draws toxins where directed.

ElectroHemps combines Electrokinetics, Phytoremediation, and Biofilters into the Remediation removal process. Key point: Electrokinetics draws toxins where directed.

Natural biofilters for toxic metals

The following Science Paper highlights how ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Rafts can be used as Biofilters to clean pollution from water sources.

Phytoremediation Raft Infographic- Plants cycle water toxins when grown on Rafts

a wide variety of agricultural and forestry by products have been used as biosorbents of toxic metals in a bid to develop biofilters for specific applications Electronic Journal of Biotechnology: 

The added benefit of how ElectroHemp equips these rafts with Electrokinetics will actually increase the toxic contamination removal because of the forced migration of the toxins is directed towards the rafts and plants roots which growing on the Phytoremediation Rafts.

ElectroHemp Phytoremediation Raft designs can be designed to remove any number or combination of toxic pollutants found in water sources.

 Real Life Example phytoremediation raft design for the removal of Lead (Pb) from Water

A floating phytoremediation raft constructed of: waste tea leaves, Pinus pinaster bark, Olea europea, Acacia nilotica bark. Which has these plant examples growing on it: Kenaf, Water Lettuce, Alligator Weed create a combination of Natural Solutions in the detoxification of Lead (Pb) from water. Scotty, ElectroHemp 

Phytoremediation Science Paper link

• i) Cotton - Hg; Groundnut skins - Cu; 
• Tree Bark (Pinus, Acacia etc.) - variety of metals; 
• Agrowaste - variery of metals; 
• waste tea leaves - Pb, Cd, and Zn; 
• Pinus radiata -U; 
• Apple waste -Variety of metals; 
• Cellulose - Variety of metals; Rice hulls - Variety of metals; 
• Exhausted coffee grounds - Hg; 
• Pinus pinaster bark - Zn, Cu, Pb. Saw mill dust (wood waste)- Cr; 
• Freshwater green algae - variety of metals; 
• Marine algae- Pb, Ni; 
• ii) Sphagnum (moss peat) - Cr(VI); 
• iii) Immobilized Aspergillus niger, A. oryzae - Cd, Cu, Pb, and Ni ; 
• Olive mill waste Olea europea Cr, Ni, Pb, Cd, and Zn, Cu and Ni; 
• Streptomyces rimosus (bacteria); 
• Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast); 
• Penicillium chrysogenum (fungi), Fuscus vesiculosus and Ascophyllum nodosum (marine algae) Zn, Cu andNi; Phanerochaete chrysosporium, P. versicolar - Pb, Ni, Cr, Cd, Cu; Pinus radiata - U;
• Immobilized Pseudomonas putida 5-X and Aspergillus niger, Mucor rouxxi - Cu; 
• Actionomycetes, Aspergillus niger, A.oryzae, Rhizopus arrhizus, R. nigricans- Cd; Rhizopus arrhizus - Cr(VI), Pb; Rhizopus nigricans, Phanarochaete chrysogenum -Pb; Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus arrhizus - Ni 

Acacia nilotica bark serves as an adsorbent of toxic metals. Bark (1 g) when added to 100 ml of aqueous solution containing 10 mg ml-1 metal solution exhibited different metal adsorption values for different metals. The order of metal adsorption being Cr > Ni > Cu > Cd> As > Pb. A similar trend of metal adsorption was observed when the bark is reused (1strecycle) Cr > Ni > Cu > Cd > Pb and also in the column-sorption. In order to verify the metal removal property of A. nilotica bark, toxicity bioassay with Salix viminalis stem cuttings in hydroponic system augmented with Cd, Cr and Pb together with A. nilotica bark powder was carried out. The results of toxicity bioassay confirmed the metal adsorption property of the bark powder. The functions of toxicity studies include leaf area, root length and number of new root primordia produced per stump. The leaf area, root length and number of new root primordia increased considerably in the presence of A. nilotica bark. The order of metal toxicity for leaf area and new root primordial is Cd > Cr > Pb. However, for root length the order of metal toxicity is Cr > Cd > Pb. The metal budgets of the leaf and root confirmed that the bark powder had adsorbed substantial amount of toxic metals and thus, alleviates the toxicity imposed by the various tested elements (Prasad et al. 2001).

Quercus ilex L. phytomass from stem, leaf and root as adsorbent of chromium, nickel, copper, cadmium and lead at ambient temperature was investigated. The metal uptake capacity of the root for different metals was found to be in the order of: Ni > Cd > Pb > Cu > Cr; stem Ni > Pb> Cu > Cd > Cr and leaf Ni > Cd > Cu > Pb > Cr. The highest amount adsorbed was Ni (root > leaf > stem). Data from this laboratory demonstrated that Ni is mostly sequestered in the roots where concentrations can be as high as 7.30 nmol/g dry weight, when one year old seedlings were treated with Ni (2000 mg/l) in pot culture experiments, compared to 0.13 nmol/g dry weight, in the control. This proves that the root biomass of Q. ilex has the capacity for complexing Ni. Chromium exhibited the least adsorption values for all the three types of phytomass compared to other metals. The trend of adsorption of the phytomass was similar for nickel and cadmium i.e. root > leaf > stem. Desorption with 10 mM Na2 EDTA was effective (55-90%). Hence, there exists the possibility of recycling the phytomass. The biosorption results of recycled phytomass suggests, that the selected adsorbents are reusable (Prasad and Freitas, 2000).

Toxic Contamination and Remediation

The design and process of the ElectroHemp BioRad Toxic Contamination and Remediation system performs the steps addressed in this Phytoremediation Science Paper without having to Genetically Alter anything. 

Accomplishing 3 of the 4 needed steps mentioned below.

Figure 4. Several factors would accelerate phytoremediation technology. The prime being: genetic engineering and production of transgenics having tolerance and metal accumulation ability for use in phytoremediation, facilitating the factors that would influence the metal bioaccumulation coefficient which inturn will depends upon heavy metal availability in the soil, absorption, transport and sequestration etc, and development of low cost technologies for chelate-induced hyperaccumulation.

Missouri Politicians and MO Dept Ag

It's time to get proactive instead of reactive and create the infastructure needed to capitalize on the budding Hemp Industry.

One of the ways Hemp can help the State of Missouri is by removing the pollution in soil and water with the system ElectroHemp has designed 

It's not Rocket Science it's Phyto Science. The Magic Happens in the Roots of the Plants as they absorb the pollution. Scotty link

Kentucky quickly submits its hemp oversight plan to USDA

By BRUCE SCHREINER, December 20, 2018

In 2018, Kentucky farmers planted more than 6,700 acres (2,710 hectares) of hemp — more than twice last year’s production, according to the state’s agriculture department. More than 70 Kentucky processors are turning the plant into products. Those processors paid $7.5 million to Kentucky growers in 2017 to help supply hemp and reported $16.7 million in gross product sales, the state agriculture department said.

That’s barely a blip on the radar for Kentucky’s diversified agriculture sector.

But the state’s agriculture department received more than 1,000 applications from farmers and processors looking to participate in the 2019 hemp program. In another sign of hemp’s growing popularity, an informational and networking session in October in Elizabethtown drew about 750 farmers, processors, manufacturers and others interested in hemp, the department said.

ElectroHemp is entering: Innovating Soil 3.0 Contest

It's official, ElectroHemp has entered the FoodShot Global  contest! 

Announcement middle January

ElectroHemp has entered the FoodShot Global  contest! 

Have you heard about the 2018-2019 FoodShot Global event that will be promoting soil health to increase food safety? 

ElectroHemp will be entering the process and system that organically cleans soil and water, better known as green remediation in the FoodShot’s first annual challenge — Innovating Soil 3.0. 

ElectroHemp will be competing and in the running for up to $10 million in equity funding and $20 million in debt funding!!!

Rajiv Singh, co-chairman of FoodShot Global, wrote on Agfunder about the contest: a search for projects and ideas that utilize the latest in technology, science, and engineering to address the crisis of soil deterioration. In particular, he writes about how a diverse set of technologies can be brought to bear to improve the conditions of the world’s soils, from machinery and equipment to low-tech farming practices, to carbon sequestration tools.

FoodShot Global Our Story 

Why is the food we eat making us sick? Why is good food more expensive? Why is there growing hunger and malnutrition in a world of plenty? Why does farming pollute and degrade our land, water, and air? 
There is a simple answer: the food system is broken. So let’s fix it. There is a better way. 
FoodShot is a collaborative platform of innovators, investors, industry leaders, and advocates who are working together to solve our biggest food system challenges.   By connecting knowledge, networks, and funding across the private and public sectors, FoodShot creates scalable, impactful, and inspired solutions – MoonShots For Better Food. 
With a global network of food industry leaders and aligned equity, debt, and prize dollars; FoodShot empowers best-in-class entrepreneurs, researchers, and advocates to transform the most critical food system challenges into opportunities for collaborative investment and meaningful change.
PROGRAM AND PROCESS  
On an annual basis, FoodShot will undertake the following,
DEFINE an annual FoodShot challenge. 
SEARCH for ground-breaking FoodShot entrepreneurs, researchers, and advocates.
VET submissions according to defined criteria.
AWARD aligned equity, debt, and non-dilutive capital to world-class ideas and businesses that are scalable, impactful, and inspired solutions to the challenge.
SCALE by leveraging a global network of stakeholders in food and agriculture. 
ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT of key thought-leaders in innovation, investment, industry and policy.  
Learn more about the Food Shot Global Opportunities at their Facebook Page Foodshot Global Facebook Page
And while you are on Facebook feel free to drop by the Hemp Environmental Forum Facebook page where Scotty also shares information about the ElectroHemp system and process and wish us luck!