Organic Remediation and Toxic Cleanup Its Not Rocket Science - Its Phyto Science. The magic happens in the roots of the plants Naturally with Phytoremediation
Wednesday, January 25, 2023
Westlake Landfill Testing Update
EPA Announces Latest Actions to Protect Groundwater and Communities from Coal Ash Contamination
Agency issues six proposed determinations to deny facilities’ requests to continue unsafe coal ash disposal Issued: Jan 25, 2023 (2:29pm EST)
WASHINGTON (Jan. 25, 2023) – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the latest action to protect communities and hold facilities accountable for controlling and cleaning up the contamination created by coal ash disposal. The Agency issued six proposed determinations to deny facilities’ requests to continue disposing of coal combustion residuals (CCR or coal ash) into unlined surface impoundments.
For a seventh facility that has withdrawn its application, Apache Generating Station in Cochise, Arizona, EPA issued a letter identifying concerns with deficiencies in its liner components and groundwater monitoring program.
“With today’s proposed denials, EPA is holding facilities accountable and protecting our precious water resources from harmful contamination, all while ensuring a reliable supply of electricity to our communities,” said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan. “We remain committed to working with our state partners to protect everyone, especially those in communities overburdened by pollution, from coal ash contamination now and into the future.”
Coal ash is a byproduct of burning coal in coal-fired power plants that, without proper management, can pollute waterways, groundwater, drinking water, and the air. Coal ash contains contaminants like mercury, cadmium, chromium, and arsenic associated with cancer and various other serious health effects.
Today’s action delivers protections for underserved communities already overburdened by pollution, and reflects the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to advancing environmental justice in impacted communities.
EPA is proposing to deny the applications for continued use of unlined surface impoundments at the following six facilities:
- Belle River Power Plant, China Township, Michigan.
- Coal Creek Station, Underwood, North Dakota.
- Conemaugh Generating Station, New Florence, Pennsylvania.
- Coronado Generating Station, St. Johns, Arizona.
- Martin Lake Steam Electric Station, Tatum, Texas.
- Monroe Power Plant, Monroe, Michigan.
EPA is proposing to deny these applications because the owners and operators of the CCR units fail to demonstrate that the surface impoundments comply with requirements of the CCR regulations. Specifically, EPA is proposing to deny these applications due to:
- Inadequate groundwater monitoring networks.
- Failure to prove groundwater is monitored to detect and characterize any elevated levels of contaminants coming from the coal ash surface impoundment.
- Evidence of potential releases from the impoundments and insufficient information to support claims that the contamination is from sources other than the impoundments.
- Inadequate documentation for the design and performance of the impoundment liners.
- Failure to meet all location restrictions.
If EPA finalizes these denials, the facilities will have to either stop sending waste to these unlined impoundments or submit applications to EPA for extensions to the deadline for unlined coal ash surface impoundments to stop receiving waste.
In the significant interest of maintaining grid reliability, the Agency is also proposing a process for these facilities to seek additional time, if needed to address demonstrated grid reliability issues. This process relies in part on reliability assessments from the relevant regional transmission organizations, ensuring a reliable supply of electricity while protecting public health.
EPA is collecting public comments on these proposals for 30 days through dockets in Regulations.gov. For more information, visit the Part B implementation webpage.
Background
The CCR Part B Final Rule, published November 12, 2020, allowed facilities to demonstrate to EPA that, based on groundwater data and the design of a particular surface impoundment, the operation of the unit has and will continue to ensure there is no reasonable probability of adverse effects to human health and the environment. EPA approval would allow the unit to continue to operate.
EPA received applications for alternate liner demonstrations from eight facilities with 17 CCR surface impoundments. These applications were from facilities in Arizona, Louisiana, Michigan, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Texas. One Arizona facility and the Louisiana facility have since withdrawn their applications.
Learn more about coal ash
Thursday, November 17, 2022
Jana Elementary Nuclear News Florissant MO
typo: that is $49.5 Million. @TeamSaintLouis has requested that the current $49,500,000 maximum contract amount be increased by
— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 17, 2022
to allow the cost-plus-fixed-fee task order W912P921F0260.
image When Scientist Lie People Die source:https://t.co/roxrugvLOT pic.twitter.com/ke2RTFatgw
I stand by what I said in this tweet. When I get some testing tools I will test this whole city and north county and share the info to the world. https://t.co/RoDimgI7UC
— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 17, 2022
I stand by what I said in this tweet. When I get some testing tools I will test this whole city and north county and share the info to the world. https://t.co/RoDimgI7UC
— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 17, 2022Join the FUSRAP team for a townhouse at the Florissant Municipal Court tonight, from 5 to 8 p.m. to review the preliminary results from sampling efforts for radioactive material at Jana Elementary School.
Presentation will be from 6 - 7 p.m CST.
— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 17, 2022
Please email questions to STLFUSRAP@usace.army.mil #JanaElementary #Nuclear #PlayGround
anyone can attend for free ! Here is the Jana Elementary School Nuclear Report from USARMY FUSRAP Facebook Live Link and invitation: https://fb.me/e/325DvwNfg
Here is the Jana Elementary School Nuclear Report from USARMY FUSRAP Facebook Live Link and invitation: https://fb.me/e/325DvwNfg |
h/t @TeamSaintLouis FUSRAP ACE https://t.co/sklsScPLDp
— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 17, 2022
The Florissant Municipal Court is located at 4575 Washington St., Florissant, MO 63033.
In advance of tonight’s public engagement, the St. Louis District has posted some of the materials that will be shared and discussed.
These materials, along with additional information on these efforts, can be accessed here: www.mvs.usace.army.mil/Missions/FUSRAP/Jana-Elementary/
For more information: https://www.mvs.usace.army.mil/.../community-about.../
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Headquarters | Mississippi Valley Division (US Army Corps of Engineers)
@TeamSaintLouis that $49,500,00 contract
— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 17, 2022
that allows the cost-plus-fixed-fee task order W912P921F0260, St Louis FUSRAP
project, currently underway- would seem to buy Scientist who maybe not telling the truth. https://t.co/ZnDEVrND0a Which Govt Agency is fixing the books? @EPA
Wednesday, August 3, 2022
Radiation Testing Contract StLouis FUSRAP
@cureworks @WULF_HEMP_SEED i was amazed at the cost of this service: It is requested that the current $49,500,000 maximum contract amount be increased by $unknown to allow the cost-plus-fixed-fee task order W912P921F0260, St Louis FUSRAP pic.twitter.com/GFiohGfQXL
— StLScotty (@StLScotty1) August 3, 2022
Development of Microcontroller-Based System for Background Radiation Monitoring https://t.co/Y1aCsmF9Bx #arduino #radiation tester
— StLScotty (@StLScotty1) August 3, 2022
@TeamSaintLouis that $49,500,00 contract
— systembuster (@stlsystembuster) November 17, 2022
that allows the cost-plus-fixed-fee task order W912P921F0260, St Louis FUSRAP
project, currently underway- would seem to buy Scientist who maybe not telling the truth. https://t.co/ZnDEVrND0a Which Govt Agency is fixing the books? @EPA
Sunday, January 2, 2022
Green Remediation Best Management Practices: Bioremediation
Green Remediation Best Management Practices: Bioremediation” fact sheet (EPA 542-F-10-006)
This fact sheet update- in collaboration with the Greener Cleanups Subcommittee of the U.S. EPA Technical Support Project’s Engineering Forum.
To view BMP fact sheets on other topics, visit CLU-IN Green Remediation Focus: www.clu-in.org/greenremediation
- 1 U.S. EPA. Greener Cleanups. Principles for Greener Cleanups. https://www.epa.gov/greenercleanups
- 2 U.S. EPA. Engineering Issue: In Situ and Ex Situ Biodegradation Technologies for Remediation of Contaminated Sites. EPA/625/R-06/015. October 2006. https://clu-in.org/download/contaminantfocus/dnapl/Treatment_Technologies/epa_2006_engin_issue_bio.pdf
- 3 U.S. Geological Survey. Phytoforensics – Using Trees to Find Contamination. Fact Sheet 2017–3076. September 2017. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2017/3076/fs20173076.pdf
- 4 U.S. EPA. Green Remediation Best Management Practices: An Overview. EPA 542-F-16-001. December 2015 update. https://cluin.org/greenremediation/docs/GR_BMP_factsheet_overview.pdf
- 5 Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. Optimizing Injection Strategies and In situ Remediation Performance. https://ois-isrp-1.itrcweb.org/
- 6 U.S. EPA. Bay Road Holdings LLC (formerly Romic Environmental Technologies Corporation). https://www.epa.gov/ca/bay-road-holdings-llc-formerly-romicenvironmental-technologies-corporation
- 7 U.S. EPA. Spreadsheets for Environmental Footprint Analysis. https://clu-in.org/greenremediation/SEFA
- 8 U.S. Department of Agriculture. BioPreferred Program Catalog: Intermediates – Lubricant Components. https://www.biopreferred.gov/BioPreferred/faces/catalog/Catalog.xhtml
- 9 U.S. EPA. CLU-IN Green Remediation Focus. Profiles: Camp Lejeune Military Reservation. https://clu-in.org/greenremediation/profiles/camplejeune
- 10 U.S. EPA. CLU-IN Green Remediation Focus. Profiles: Re-Solve Inc. https://clu-in.org/greenremediation/profiles/resolveinc
Remedy Protectiveness and Climate Resilience in Site Cleanups: Policies, Guidance and Implementation Tools As of November 8, 2021 A product of the Fall 2021 meeting of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (Google Doc web link: Information in this summary is current up to November 8, 2021)
The Conference is designed for and presented by scientists, engineers, regulators,
remediation site owners, constructors, and other environmental professionals
representing universities, government agencies, consultants, and R&D and service
firms from around the world.
The program will reflect the growing body of knowledge about better ways to manage contaminated sediment systems.
The Sediments Conference series is a forum for sharing research results, practicalexperiences, and opportunities associated with investigating, remediating, andrestoring the environmental and economic vitality of waterways. Managing theseaquatic systems requires complex actions that affect a diverse group of stakeholdersand touch a wide range of environmental, economic, political and social issues
Search This Blog
ElectroHemp Introduction
ElectroHemp Hazardous Waste Remediation Intro
ElectroHemp BioRad Hazardous Waste Cleanup Introduction ElectroHemp - BioRad CleanUp 5 Stage Phytoremediation Treatment Train - Remove...
-
Too bad the EPA Scientist weren't interested in Solving the Pollution that is contaminating this earth. https://t.co/Kp1JDyrJKq https:/...
-
Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable Technology Cost and Performance Reports Glass Furnace Technology (GFT) Demonstration at the Hazen ...
-
EPA Takes Important Step to Advance PFAS Strategic Roadmap, Requests Public Input and Data to Inform Potential Future Regulations under CE...