RXleaf- Hemp Cleans Up Radioactive Soil

It's great that RX leaf highlights the value of using Hemp to clean up Radioactive Soil in their Article

Many people get this. But don't realize: 
1) what is the next step? What's a person do with a bunch of toxic plants? 
2) what about the places in the soil that the hemp roots don't come in contact with the toxins? Meaning the toxins are still there. 
3) 99% of any science papers all say: phytoremediation takes a long time. Who wants to wait, when the toxins need removed asap? 
4) shouldn't all birds, animals, and humans be kept away from toxic Hemp plants? Fences don't stop birds, animals, or people. 
5) lots of plants can be used for phytoremediation (400 that I'm aware of). Is it better to have a huge plant to dispose of with X amount of toxins or a smaller plant with the same X amount of toxins? ....

I agree Hemp is great, and is even greater when used in combination with the system our team has figured out that both speeds up the toxic removal and also disposes it safely eliminating all the hazards that so many don't realize.

It's not rocket science, it's phyto science. And the #ElectroHemp system also turns the hazardous waste infected plants into cash!
Learn more at the https://m.facebook.com/HempEnvironmentalForum/ or the blogs: #ElectroHemp and #MOHempEnergy

Reduction of Uranium

...the reduction of uranium was done by quantifying the fraction of uranium in both the soluble and insoluble pools. 

• Uranium in the cultures spiked to 3 μM shifted from ~90% soluble at the T0 time point for all 3 concentrations to 70–97% insoluble by the end of the 24 day incubations (Fig 3). 
• A mass balance indicated that 93–102% of the added uranium could be accounted for in the soluble/insoluble pools. 
• Interestingly, the bacterium also reduced uranium as efficiently at 5 and 10 μM concentration (up to 97%-S2 Fig). 
• However, the percent of soluble uranium at the T0 sampling time point was 78% for the 5 μM and 18% for the 10 μM treatments. Presumably, the bacteria were stimulated by the prior exposure to uranium during transfer and began reducing the radionuclide before the T0 samples could be collected. link
  

Electrokinetic coupled Phytotechnology - ElectroHemp

3 Electrokinetic coupled Phytotechnology articles that support the ElectroHemp phytoremediation techniques the team has developed. All Science Papers on Phytoremediation say, " Its Slow " < Therefore to overcome this obstacle and go above and beyond this fault. It only makes sense to speed up things up with something I'm sure Nicola Tesla would approve of with Electrokinetics system that sends low voltage pulses thru water or soil and at the same time helps plants grow bigger faster with higher harvest results. BOOM.

79 Research Articles on Phytoremediation for Bioenergy

its not Rocket Science its Phyto Science!  79 Research Articles used as a Reference in this Science paper by Helena Gomes.

Phytoremediation for bioenergy: challenges and opportunities

Helena I. Gomes 

Pages 59-66 | Received 23 Oct 2011, Accepted 20 May 2012, Accepted author version posted online: 24 May 2012, Published online: 25 Jun 2012

• Download citation
 
• https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2012.696715
References

• European Environment Agency. 2007. Progress in Management of Contaminated Sites, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Report CSI 015
   
  [Google Scholar]
• US Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Search Superfund Site Information Available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/supercpad/cursites/srchsites.cfm.
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Dull, M. and Wernstedt, K. 2010. Land recycling, community revitalization, and distributive politics: An analysis of EPA Brownfields Program support. Policy Stud. J., 38: 119–141. (doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00347.x)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Barceló, J. and Poschenrieder, C. 2003. Phytoremediation: Principles and perspectives. Contrib. Sci., 2: 333–344. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Van-Camp, L., Bujarrabal, B., Gentile, A. R., Jones, R. J.A., Montanarella, L., Olazabal, C. and Selvaradjou, S.-K. 2004. Reports of the Technical Working Groups Established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. EUR 21319 EN/4
   
  [Google Scholar]
• United States Government Accountability Office. 2010. EPA's Estimated Costs to Remediate Existing Sites Exceed Current Funding Levels, and More Sites Are Expected to Be Added to the National Priorities List, Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Cunningham, S. D., Berti, W. R. and Huang, J. W. 1995. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Trends Biotechnol., 13: 393–397. (doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(00)88987-8)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Kumar, P. B.A.N., Dushenkov, V., Motto, H. and Raskin, I. 1995. Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ. Sci. Technol., 29: 1232–1238. (doi:10.1021/es00005a014)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• US Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Green Remediation: Incorporating Sustainable Environmental Practices into Remediation of Contaminated Sites, Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Onwubuya, K., Cundy, A., Puschenreiter, M., Kumpiene, J., Bone, B., Greaves, J., Teasdale, P., Mench, M., Tlustos, P., Mikhalovsky, S., Waite, S., Friesl-Hanl, W., Marschner, B. and Müller, I. 2009. Developing decision support tools for the selection of ‘gentle’ remediation approaches. Sci. Total Environ., 407: 6132–6142. (doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.017)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Reddy, K. R. and Adams, J. A. 2010. Towards Green and Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Site, 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics New Delhi, , India
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Raskin, I. I, Smith, R. D. and Salt, D. E. 1997. Phytoremediation of metals: Using plants to remove pollutants from the environment. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 8: 221–226. (doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80106-1)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Meagher, R. B. 2000. Phytoremediation of toxic elemental and organic pollutants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 3: 153–162. (doi:10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00054-0)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Rowe, R. L., Street, N. R. and Taylor, G. 2009. Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 13: 271–290. (doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Mleczek, M., Rutkowski, P., Rissmann, I., Kaczmarek, Z., Golinski, P., Szentner, K., Strazynska, K. and Stachowiak, A.2010. Biomass productivity and phytoremediation potential of Salix alba and Salix viminalis. Biomass Bioenergy, 34(9): 1410–1418. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.012)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Ericsson, K., Rosenqvis, H. and Nilsson, L. J. 2009. Energy crop production costs in the EU. Biomass Bioenergy, 33(11): 1577–1586. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.08.002)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• European Commission. 2006. Biofuels in the European Union – A vision for 2030 and beyond, Brussels: Directorate-General for Research. Final report of the Biofuels Research Advisory Council, EUR 22066, European Commission
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Tyner, W. E. 2008. The US ethanol and biofuels boom: Its origins, current status, and future prospects. BioScience, 58(7): 646–653. (doi:10.1641/B580718)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Sasaki, N., Owari, T. and Putz, F. E. 2011. Time to substitute wood bioenergy for nuclear power in Japan. Energies, 4: 1051–1057. (doi:10.3390/en4071051)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Lamers, P., Hamelinck, C., Junginger, M. and Faaijc, A. 2011. International bioenergy trade – a review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 32: 2655–2676. (doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.022)
  [Crossref]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Nonhebel, S. 2005. Renewable energy and food supply: Will there be enough land?. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 9: 191–201. (doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.02.003)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Suer, P., Andersson-Sköld, Y., Blom, S., Bardos, P., Track, T. and Polland, M. 2009. Environmental impact assessment of biofuel production on contaminated land – Swedish case studies, Linköping: Swedish Geotechnical Institute. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Trapp, S. and Karlson, U. 2001. Aspects of phytoremediation of organic pollutants. J. Soils Sediments, 1: 1–7. (doi:10.1007/BF02986461)
  [Crossref]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Burken, J. G. and Schnoor, J. L. 1997. Uptake and metabolism of atrazine by poplar trees. Environ. Sci. Technol., 31: 1399–1406. (doi:10.1021/es960629v)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Wu, G., Kang, H., Zhang, X., Shao, H., Chu, L. and Ruan, C. 2010. A critical review on the bio-removal of hazardous heavy metals from contaminated soils: Issues, progress, eco-environmental concerns and opportunities. J. Hazard. Mater., 174: 1–8. (doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.113)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Maestri, E., Marmiroli, M., Visioli, G. and Marmiroli, N. 2010. Metal tolerance and hyperaccumulation: Costs and trade-offs between traits and environment. Environ. Exp. Bot., 68: 1–13. (doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.10.011)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Newman, L. A. and Reynolds, C. M. 2004. Phytodegradation of organic compounds. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 15: 225–230. (doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2004.04.006)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Gerhardt, K. E., Huang, X.-D., Glick, B. R. and Greenberg, B. M. 2009. Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: Potential and challenges. Plant Sci., 176: 20–30. (doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.09.014)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Sas-Nowosielska, A., Kucharski, R., Malkowski, E., Pogrzeba, M., Kuperberg, J. M. and Krynski, K. 2004. Phytoextraction crop disposal – an unsolved problem. Environ. Pollut., 128: 373–379. (doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2003.09.012)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Koppolu, L., Agblevor, F. A. and Clements, L. D. 2003. Pyrolysis as a technique for separating heavy metals from hyperaccumulators. Part II: Lab-scale pyrolysis of synthetic hyperaccumulator biomass. Biomass Bioenergy, 25: 651–663. (doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00057-6)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Koppolu, L. and Clements, L. D. 2003. Pyrolysis as a technique for separating heavy metals from hyperaccumulators. Part I: Preparation of synthetic hyperaccumulator biomass. Biomass Bioenergy, 24: 69–79. (doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00074-0)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Koppolu, L., Prasad, R. and Clements, L. D. 2004. Pyrolysis as a technique for separating heavy metals from hyperaccumulators. Part III: Pilot-scale pyrolysis of synthetic hyperaccumulator biomass. Biomass Bioenergy, : 463–472. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.010)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Lehmann, J. 2007. Bioenergy in the black. Front. Ecol. Environ., 5(7): 381–387. (doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:BITB]2.0.CO;2)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Fiorese, G. and Guariso, G. 2010. A GIS-based approach to evaluate biomass potential from energy crops at regional scale. Environ. Model. Softw., 25: 702–711. (doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.11.008)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Zabaniotou, A. A., Kantarelis, E. K. and Theodoropoulos, D. C. 2008. Sunflower shells utilization for energetic purposes in an integrated approach of energy crops: Laboratory study pyrolysis and kinetics. Bioresour. Technol., 99: 3174–3181. (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.060)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Simpson, J. A., Picchi, G., Gordon, A. M., Thevathasan, N. V., Stanturf, J. and Nicholas, I. Task 30 Short rotation crops for bioenergy systems. Environmental benefits associated with short-rotation woody crops Technical Review No. 3, IEA Bioenergy, 2009. Available at http://www.shortrotationcrops.org/taskreports.htm.
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Clair, S. S., Hillier, J. and Smith, P. 2008. Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production. Biomass Bioenergy, 32: 442–452. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.001)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Britt, C., Bullard, M., Hickman, G., Johnson, P., King, J., Nicholson, F., Nixon, P. and Smith, N. 2002. Bioenergy crops and bioremediation – a review, London: Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Dickinson, N. M. and Pulford, I. D. 2005. Cadmium phytoextraction using short-rotation coppice Salix: The evidence trail. Environ. Int., 31: 609–613. (doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.10.013)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• French, C. J., Dickinson, N. M. and Putwain, P. D. 2006. Woody biomass phytoremediation of contaminated brownfield land. Environ. Pollut., 141: 387–395. (doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.065)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Volk, T. A., Abrahamson, L. P., Nowak, C. A., Smart, L. B., Tharakan, P. J. and White, E. H. 2006. The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation. Biomass Bioenergy, 30: 715–727. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.03.001)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Miller, R. S., Khan, Z. and Doty, S. L. 2011. Comparison of trichloroethylene toxicity, removal, and degradation by varieties of Populus and Salix for improved phytoremediation applications. J. Bioremed. Biodegrad., pp. S7:001, doi: 10.4172/2155-6199.S7-001
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Shi, G. and Cai, Q. 2009. Cadmium tolerance and accumulation in eight potential energy crops. Biotechnol. Adv., 27: 555–561. (doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.006)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Nie, S.-W., Gao, W.-S., Chen, Y.-Q., Sui, P. and Eneji, A. E. 2010. Use of life cycle assessment methodology for determining phytoremediation potentials of maize-based cropping systems in fields with nitrogen fertilizer over-dose. J. Cleaner Prod., 18: 1530–1534. (doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.007)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Ginneken, L. V., Meers, E., Guisson, R., Ruttens, A., Elst, K., Tack, F. M.G., Vangronsveld, J., Diels, L. and Dejonghe, W.2007. Phytoremediation for heavy metal-contaminated soils combined with bioenergy production. J. Environ. Eng. Landscape Manage, XV: 227–236. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Meers, E., Slycken, S. V., Adriaensen, K., Ruttens, A., Vangronsveld, J., Laing, G. D., Witters, N., Thewys, T. and Tack, F. M.G. 2010. The use of bioenergy crops (Zea mays) for ‘phytoattenuation’ of heavy metals on moderately contaminated soils: A field experiment. Chemosphere, 78: 35–41. (doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.015)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Thewys, T. and Kuppens, T. 2008. Economics of willow pyrolysis after phytoextraction. Int. J. Phytorem., 10: 561–583. (doi:10.1080/15226510802115141)
  [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Thewys, T., Witters, N., Meers, E. and Vangronsveld, J. 2008. Economic viability of phytoremediation of a cadmium contaminated agricultural area using energy maize. Part II: Economics of anaerobic digestion of metal contaminated maize in Belgium. Int. J. Phytorem., 12: 663–679. (doi:10.1080/15226514.2010.493188)
  [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Witters, N., Mendelsohn, R., Van Passel, S., Van Slycken, S., Weyens, N., Schreurs, E., Meers, E., Tack, F., Vanheusden, B. and Vangronsveld, J. 2012. Phytoremediation, a sustainable remediation technology? II: Economic assessment of CO2 abatement through the use of phytoremediation crops for renewable energy production. Biomass Bioenergy, 39: 470–477. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.11.017)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Angelova, V., Ivanov, R. and Ivanov, K. 2005. Heavy metal accumulation and distribution in oil crops. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 35: 2551–2566. (doi:10.1081/CSS-200030368)
  [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Suer, P. and Andersson-Sköld, Y. 2011. Biofuel or excavation? Life cycle assessment (LCA) of soil remediation options. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 969–981. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.022)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Vangronsveld, J., Herzig, R., Weyens, N., Boulet, J., Adriaensen, K., Ruttens, A., Thewys, T., Vassilev, A., Meers, E., Nehnevajova, E., van der Lelie, D. and Mench, M. 2009. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: Lessons from the field. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 16: 765–794. (doi:10.1007/s11356-009-0213-6)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Hamby, D. M. 1991. Site remediation techniques supporting environmental restoration activities – a review. Sci. Total Environ., 191: 203–224. (doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05264-3)
  [Crossref]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• van der Lelie, D., Schwitzguébel, J.-P., Glass, D. J., Gronsveld, J. V. and Baker, A. 2001. Assessing phytoremediation's progress. Environ. Sci. Technol., 35(21): 447–452. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• H.M. Conesa, M.W.H. Evangelou, B.H. Robinson, and R. Schulin, A critical view of current state of phytotechnologies to remediate soils: Still a promising tool? TheScientificWorldJournal, 2012, doi:10.1100/2012/173829. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• P. Bardos, Y. Andersson-Sköld, S. Keuning, M. Polland, P. Suer, and T. Track, REJUVENATE. Cro-based systems for sustainable risk based land management for economically marginal degraded land, SNOWMAN Project No. SN-01/20 Final research report, 2009. Available at http://www.snowman-era.net/downloads/REJUVENATE_final_report.pdf. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Andersson-Sköld, Y., Enell, A., Blom, S., Rihm, T., Angelbratt, A., Haglund, K., Wik, O., Bardos, P., Track, T. and Keuning, S. 2009. Biofuel and other biomass based products from contaminated sites – potentials and barriers from Swedish perspectives, Linköping: Swedish Geotechnical Institute. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Lewandowski, I., Schmidt, U., Londo, M. and Faaij, A. 2006. The economic value of the phytoremediation function – assessed by the example of cadmium remediation by willow (Salix ssp). Agric. Syst., 89: 68–89. (doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.004)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Justin, M. Z., Pajk, N., Zupanc, V. and Zupančič, M. 2010. Phytoremediation of landfill leachate and compost wastewater by irrigation of Populus and Salix: Biomass and growth response. Waste Manage., 30: 1032– 1042. (doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.013)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Coyle, D. R., Zalesny, J. A. and Wiese, A. H. 2011. Irrigating poplar energy crops with landfill leache negatively affects soil micro- and meso-fauna. Int. J. Phytorem., 13: 845–858. R.S.Z. Jr. (doi:10.1080/15226514.2011.552927)
  [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Licht, L. A. and Isebrands, J. G. 2005. Linking phytoremediated pollutant removal to biomass economic opportunities. Biomass Bioenergy, 28: 203–218. (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.08.015)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Kim, K.-R. and Owens, G. 2010. Potential for enhanced phytoremediation of landfills using biosolids: A review. J. Environ. Manage., 91: 791–797. (doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.017)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Brooks, R. R., Chambers, M. F., Nicks, L. J. and Robinson, B. H. 1998. Phytomining. Trends Plant Sci., 3: 359–362. (doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01283-7)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Nedelkoska, T. V. and Doran, P. M. 2000. Characteristics of heavy metal uptake by plant species with potential for phytoremediation and phytomining. Miner. Eng., 13: 549–556. (doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(00)00035-2)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Chaney, R. L., Angle, J. S., Broadhurst, C. L., Peters, C. A., Tappero, R. V. and Sparks, D. L. 2007. Improved understanding of hyperaccumulation yields commercial phytoextraction and phytomining technologies. J. Environ. Qual., 36: 1429–1443. (doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0514)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Acar, Y. B. and Alshawabkeh, A. N. 1993. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 27: 2638–2647. (doi:10.1021/es00049a002)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Ferreira, C., Ribeiro, A. and Ottosen, L. 2005. Effect of major constituents of MSW fly ash during electrodialytic remediation of heavy metals. Separ. Sci. Technol., 40: 2007–2019. (doi:10.1081/SS-200068412)
  [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Ribeiro, A. B., Mateus, E. P., Ottosen, L. and Bech-Nielsem, G. 2000. Electrodialytic removal of Cu, Cr and As from chromated copper arsenate-treated timber waste. Environ. Sci. Technol., 34: 784–788. (doi:10.1021/es990442e)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Christensen, I. V., Pedersen, A. J., Ottosen, L. M. and Ribeiro, A. 2006. Electrodyalitic remediation of CCA-treated waste wood in a 2m2 pilot plant. Sci. Total Environ., 364: 45–54. (doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.018)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Aken, B. V. 2008. Transgenic plants for phytoremediation: Helping nature to clean up environmental pollution. Trends Biotechnol., 26: 225–227. (doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.02.001)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Dickinson, N. M., Mackay, J. M., Goodman, A. and Putwain, P. 2000. Planting trees on contaminated soils: Issues and guidelines. Land Contam. Recl., 41: 87–101. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Borjesson, P. 1999. Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden. I: Identification and quantification. Biomass Bioenergy, 16: 137–154. (doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00080-4)
  [Crossref], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• US Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Introduction to Phytoremediation, Cincinnati, OH: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency. 
   
  [Google Scholar]
• Clemens, S., Palmgren, M. G. and Krämer, U. 2002. A long way ahead: Understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Trends Plant Sci., 7: 309–315. (doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02295-1)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Nevel, L. V., Mertens, J., Oorts, K. and Verheyen, K. 2007. Phytoextraction of metals from soils: How far from practice?. Environ. Pollut., 150: 34–40. (doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.05.024)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Marchiol, L., Assolari, S., Sacco, P. and Zerbi, G. 2004. Phytoextraction of heavy metals by canola (Brassica napus) and radish (Raphanus sativus) grown on multicontaminated soil. Environ. Pollut., 132: 21–27. (doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.04.001)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Dickinson, N. M. 2000. Strategies for sustainable woodland on contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 41: 259–263. (doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00419-1)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Lebeau, T., Braud, A. and Jézéquel, K. 2008. Performance of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoextraction applied to metal contaminated soils: A review. Environ. Pollut., 153: 497–522. (doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.09.015)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]
• Glick, B. R. 2003. Phytoremediation: Synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment. Biotechnol. Adv., 21: 383–393. (doi:10.1016/S0734-9750(03)00055-7)
  [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
  , 
  [Google Scholar]

• 

  Electro Hemp Organic Remediation